“Codex Osuna” folio 7-469 recto Lines 3 and 4, and folio 25-487 Lines 3 through 6, inclusive as transcribed by Vicenta Cortes Alonso in Pintura del Gobernador, Alcaldes y Regidores de México Estudio y Transcripción, Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia, Dirección General de Archivos y Bibliotecas (1976) [pages are not numbered]

This is because no one could possibly write on an old piece of vellum? The word palimpsest doesn’t exist, and Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address is a fraud because it could not possibly have been written on the back of an old envelope? Bye the way, in another matter, D. O. thank you for pointing out earlier references to and support for the Mesoamerican Hypothesis that those of Tucker et alia including your own and that of the Comegys twins.

“Simply put, there is no way a manuscript written on vellum that contains a sunflower and an armadillo could have been written before 1492,”

and since our best information is that the vellum was made between 1400-1438, then it follows that persons who imagine they see in the drawings and armadillo or a sunflower are – simply put – wrong.