Mandrake is one of the best-known plants in medieval herbals. The root is roughly humanoid, and medieval entrepreneurs sometimes carved it to make it more overtly human. Folklore said it was dangerous to dig up the root. The plant would shriek and hearing it<\/em> could kill you, so harvesters were counseled to use a dog on a leash to dig it up.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n Many medieval herbals included the mandrake, from countries like Italy, France, England, Germany, Greece, the Middle East, and others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Sometimes only one plant is shown, sometimes two versions: “masculine” and “feminine”, as in these Arabic manuscripts:<\/p>\n\n\n\n The male\/female dichotomy goes back to the Dioscorides<\/em>. In this early copy, the faces are not explicitly drawn, but the roots are distinctly humanoid. A dog is not included in the image, but is mentioned in the text:<\/p>\n\n\n\n The humanoid root appears in early copies of Pseudo-Apuleis with a dog, but still does not have a humanoid face:<\/p>\n\n\n\n The anthropomorphic Mandrake was especially popular in the 12th to 15th centuries. This one, from 12th-century England, includes the dog pulling out the plant while two figures approach with hooks or spears:<\/p>\n\n\n\n This 13th century example is the same basic theme, with the dog, and figures with spears, but the narrative is broken up into a series of panels:<\/p>\n\n\n\n On the facing folio, the dog has done its job and two figures poke the root with hooked spears, but it is different from most depictions of mandrake in that a second figure is under the feet of the standing mandrake. The shadow under the character on the left is very doglike.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This version is the same general idea, but the spears are replaced by more familiar tools, and the male and female versions are shown as conjoined twins:<\/p>\n\n\n\n The dog is not always included. Here are a number of examples that emphasize the humanoid form both sans and with the dog:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Most mandrake drawings include berries. Some have smooth leaf margins, others are serrate. In real life, the margins are ruffled and irregularly serrate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In the 16th century, the humanoid form was gradually superseded by naturalistic representations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Voynich Manuscript has a large number of plants in the “big plant drawings” section, and yet there’s nothing that overtly resembles Mandrake. Some have suggested that f33r might be mandrake, but I think there are better identifications for 33r.<\/p>\n\n\n\nThe Mandrake in Medieval Herbals<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/voynichportal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/SingleDouble.png\")
<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n![\"Dioscorides](\"https:\/\/voynichportal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/DioscoridesMandrake.png\")
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/voynichportal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Mandrake9c.png\")
![\"BL](\"https:\/\/voynichportal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Harley5294Mandrake.png\")
![\"Codex](\"https:\/\/voynichportal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/MandrakeVindo93.png\")
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/voynichportal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/MandrakeBrown.png\")
<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n![\"Bologna](\"https:\/\/voynichportal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/MandrakeBologna.png\")
![\"sample](\"https:\/\/voynichportal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/MandragoraSamples.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\nIs Mandrake in the VMS?<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
![\"Voynich](\"https:\/\/voynichportal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/MandrakeSideways.png\")
![\"VMS](\"https:\/\/voynichportal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/MandrakeVertical-367x1024.png\")
<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n