In May 2016<\/a>, as part of a VMS zodiac series, I posted a blog about Gemini symbols evolving from twin brothers to affectionate siblings to the “otherly” love usually associated with romantic couples. I noted that the Claricia Psalter is one of the earliest depictions of male\/female Gemini in an affectionate embrace. If you haven’t read it already, I suggest you at least scan the second half of the previous blog<\/a>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
<\/a>I chose the Claricia Psalter<\/em> for a number of reasons\u2014it is one of the first zodiacs to unambiguously show the twins as different genders, and is possibly one of the earliest zodiac images of “otherly” love (c. 1200s or earlier). It’s difficult to know if the figures are fraternal twins or a romantic couple, but the fact that they are male\/female is a departure from classical images of Castor and Pollux, and also different from medieval images of the twins as warriors.<\/p>\n
But there is more… it is also, in a sense, a “template” for zodiac cycles with the same cast of characters as the Voynich Manuscript<\/em>.<\/p>\n
Background<\/strong><\/p>\n
I’ve already described classical zodiacs<\/a> a few times, but here is one from the 9th century to make it easier to see the differences between this and later zodiacs that resemble the VMS zodiac. Note the girdle on Aries, the nude, male warrior twins, Cancer as a crab, a real scorpion, and Sagittarius as a centaur:<\/p>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n
The Claricia Psalter<\/em> (Walters W.26) was created about three centuries later, probably in the southern HRE about midway between Bohemia and the Alsace, and is distinctly different in a number of ways that are relevant to the VMS.<\/p>\n
The Claricia Psalter was created for an Augsburg abbey (possibly commissioned) and yet is rather crudely drawn and painted, not much higher in general skill level than the VMS. The palette is also similar, although the Claricia is enhanced with some highlights in gold, and the shade of red is a little more orange than the VMS and used with more frequency.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Here is the Claricia zodiac together with the Augsburg Psalter (which is very similar in subject matter, and contained within roundels like the VMS):<\/p>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n
Is There a Traceable Zodiacal Tradition?<\/h4>\n
Is it possible to pin down the VMS to a specific illustrative tradition?<\/p>\n
When I search through my database of more than 500 medieval zodiacs, I find fewer than 40 (only 6% of the total) that have this particular combination:<\/p>\n
\n
- male\/female Gemini,<\/li>\n
- Libra scales with no associated human-like figure, and<\/li>\n
- Cancer as a crayfish\/lobster.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
What is even more significant about this combination-search is that quite a number of the hits also have a non-scorpion Scorpius<\/a> (in the form of a turtle\/tarasque, dragon, or reptile\/amphibian)\u2014another commonality with the VMS\u2014as in this example from the 13th century, created a few decades after the Claricia Psalter. Note also that the zodiacs are contained within roundels, like the Augsburg Psalter and the VMS:<\/p>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n
To push the comparison with the VMS beyond the realm of coincidence, some of them also have Sagittarius with legs and Leo with his tail threaded through his legs.<\/p>\n
I can’t quite tell if Cod. Vindo. Pal. 1982<\/em> (14th century) is male and female or two males, but it otherwise fits in this group, with a no-hand Libra, Cancer-crayfish, human Sagittarius, and tarasque-Scorpius.<\/p>\n
Even though it is roughly drawn, and colored only with a bit of amber wash, the zodiac symbols in BAV Pal.lat.1369<\/em> (c. 1400s) have much in common with this tradition, as well. The couple is male\/female, Cancer is a crayfish, and the scales have no figure. But this is a scientific compilation with many charts, and a number of volvelles, and the illustrator drew the zodiacs with the traditional centaur and a more-or-less real scorpion.<\/p>\n
Note the clothing, which is very similar to the VMS, including unembellished round necklines. The symbols are contained within roundels and the labels are in German, but German was used in many places, including eastern Switzerland, Germany, parts of Bohemia, and parts of Lombardy, so the language doesn’t specifically pin down the localality:<\/p>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n
This combination is first seen around the 1100s or 1200s and continues until the early 1500s. If we eliminate Sagittarius as a centaur, then we are left with those originating around the time of the Claricia Psalter<\/em> until the 1470s. Specifying a human Sagittarius eliminates Hildegard von Bingen’s zodiac, a 13th-century zodiac from Stuttgart, Ludwig VIII 3, Codex Sang. 42<\/em>, and the Augsburg Psalter<\/em>, but I was curious to see which ones had the greatest similarity to the VMS symbols.<\/p>\n
Morgan MS M.280<\/em> is very similar in format to Walters W.78<\/em> (the Augsburg Psalter). It has roundels with a clasping couple, crayfish, no-figure scale, and tarasque-Scorpius, but lacks the human Sagittarius:<\/p>\n
<\/a>Morgan M.280<\/em> and Walters W.78<\/em> demonstrate how two different illustrators can draw essentially the same things in quite different ways simply by changing the direction of a head or tail, or adding a detail or two:<\/p>\n
<\/a>Even though it has twists of its own, like the double-crayfish and the added stars, in terms of subject matter and chronology, the VMS zodiac fits quite well with this group. You can almost guess that Aquarius would probably be a mostly-clothed male with a single jug rather than two, and that Capricorn would be a running or walking goat rather than a mythical goatfish or a goat next to a water-well:<\/p>\n
<\/a><\/h4>\n
Another Transition<\/h4>\n
By the 1460s, another change was unfolding… a number of zodiac illustrators who closely followed the above patterns, including leg-tail tongue-Leo, reverted back to the traditional nude male twins and naturalistic scorpion, as in\u00a0Codex Pal. Germ 298<\/em> (which also has a crossbowman) and LJS 449.<\/em><\/p>\n