This is a plant ID I posted 4 1\/2 years ago. As some readers may have noticed, I uploaded many plant IDs in July 2013, but took down more than half of them about a week later because I was eager to solve the VMS and felt I might be giving too much away, but since the VMS has not yet been solved, as of Feb. 2018, I’ve had a change of heart and have decided to post them again as I have time. I haven’t changed the original text because I haven’t seen anything in the interim that alters my opinion about this plant.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Description<\/strong><\/p>\n
Plant 18v features a large drawing occupying most of the page. There is a ten-line block of text to the right at the top.<\/p>\n
The stalk is quite upright and lightly painted. The leaves are a fairly solid green and fan-like, with about six rounded tips per leaf. The way they are attached to the stalk is variable\u2014sometimes alternate, sometimes opposite. Some plants are like this, but most tend to lean toward one or the other.<\/p>\n
The root has two sections, more bulbous near the stalk, with a long rhizome at the base. It is selectively painted a light reddish-brown and includes a long “tail” that might be characteristic of the plant (some plants have extended rhizomes that are more slender) or which might be symbolically related to the identity of the plant. There are protrusions from the rhizome shaped a bit like a caterpillar.<\/p>\n
Prior Identifications<\/h4>\n
<\/a>Edith Sherwood<\/a> has identified this as columbine (Aquilegia alpina)<\/em>, perhaps because colombine leaves are somewhat fingerlike, but I don’t think it’s a very good fit. Colombine leaves do fan out, but they are also trifoliate, which the VMS leaves are not, and colombine does not have an elaborate, extended, branched style\/pistil. In fact, one of the distinctive characteristics of colombine is that the flowers nod and have spurs extending toward the sky, something that is not expressed in any way in the VMS drawing.<\/p>\n
Other Possibilities<\/h4>\n
I only have a few candidates for Plant 18v and I’m not satisfied that the first three are close enough, but I’ll mention them, for the record:<\/p>\n
\n
- Plant 18v leaves are very similar to Lady’s mantle (Alchemilla vulgaris)<\/em>, a plant with a woody rhizome included in many herbal manuscripts, but if the VMS depicts Alchemilla<\/em>, then the tiny clusters of flowers have been greatly magnified and modified. It doesn’t seem likely that Alchemilla<\/em> flowers would be drawn this way. VMS Plant 23r is much more similar to Alchemilla than 18v\u2014<\/em>with fingerlike leaves, branching flower clusters, and the thick matted growth pattern clearly expressed in Plant 23r.<\/li>\n
- There is also a species of Convolvulus<\/em> (known to many as morning glory or bindweed) that has fingerlike leaves and a number of protrusions within the petals, but unlike the VMS drawing, it’s a viny plant that grows lower to the ground, and the style\/pistil doesn’t resemble the VMS drawing.<\/li>\n
- Geranium molle<\/em> (dove’s-foot cranesbill) also has fingerlike leaves, but the leaves are more elaborate than the VMS and, like Convolvulus<\/em>, the plant is somewhat viny and low-growing. Geranium molle<\/em> does, however, have a branched style\/pistil with little knobs on the end (I prefer to stay away from botanical terms because “knobs” are not always stigmas and anthers), so perhaps it’s not unreasonable to keep Geranium molle<\/em> as a possibility, but it’s not at the top of my list because the overall shape of the plant and complexity of the leaves is dissimilar to Plant 18v.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n